<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Social Media on gtank writes here</title><link>http://blog.gtank.cc/tag/social-media/</link><description>Recent content in Social Media on gtank writes here</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 21:28:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://blog.gtank.cc/tag/social-media/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Humanist social networking</title><link>http://blog.gtank.cc/humanist-social-networks/</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>http://blog.gtank.cc/humanist-social-networks/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Despite their name and ostensible purpose, social networks aren&amp;rsquo;t very human. To companies, engineers, and advertisers, the emphasis has been on &lt;em&gt;network&lt;/em&gt;, not &lt;em&gt;social&lt;/em&gt;. We flatten users into profiles and communities into graphs. While it&amp;rsquo;s certainly convenient for databases, it&amp;rsquo;s an utter failure at capturing the nuances of social interaction—when you force people to interact in inhuman ways, you can&amp;rsquo;t be surprised if you get inhuman behavior.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How do we fix it? I&amp;rsquo;ll tell you up front that I don&amp;rsquo;t have answers. It&amp;rsquo;s looking pretty grim out there. From here in 2019, it looks like may not get to keep both global social networks and a functioning society.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>